We have seen it time and again since pioneering asset management liftouts 55 years ago… and it seems everything you should NOT DO was done in the current Barings/Corinthia private credit debacle. Adhere to contractual stipulations and act ethically and above board (non-solicits, non-competes, garden leaves, etc) – i.e. don‘t take files, don’t act as a group, don‘t talk to clients and other basics.

In 55 years of doing C-level search and liftouts, we have never seen an injunction the way it has been granted last week by Special Superior Court Judge Adam Conrad.

While team liftouts are an excellent inorganic way to grow, especially for top performers that are not appropriately rewarded, compensated or distributed where they currently are, there are a ton of things one needs to consider in the process of doing an „ethical liftout“.

If you destroy the business that you are lifting from, you can‘t do it.

If you have onerous contracts in place, you can‘t do it.

If you can‘t take the record and be profitable within a year, don‘t do it.

If you don‘t have someone on retainer that can protect all parties involved and do a liftout the right way, ethically, don‘t do it.

Private Credit has been in great demand in recent years (along with alternatives overall), but given the complexities of private market structures, it becomes even more difficult.

You can‘t leave with two dozen people on a Friday night and expect to buy a business on the cheap with a phone call.

Tech and finance like to do liftouts because they get exactly what they want, like a one-product boutique acquisition, but ethics, culture, legalities and processes are key in doing them the right way.